• We The 66
  • Posts
  • 🌊 Oakland's Political Experiment Gone Wrong

🌊 Oakland's Political Experiment Gone Wrong

How bad policy and leadership made Oakland the robbery capital of America

Former Mayor Sheng Thao

Did someone forward you this? Subscribe here free!

By Max Towey

You’d be hard-pressed to find an American city that’s had a worse six-year stretch than Oakland, California.

Consider where it was in 2019: Property values were climbing; crime was dropping; and three major sports teams – including the dynastic Golden State Warriors – played there. It wasn’t as rich or relevant as its cross-Bay twin city, but it was green and growing. 

In the period since, all three sports teams have left the city; a crime surge caused an exodus of new businesses; its mayor and DA were both recalled; and now, per a new grand jury report, it’s cruising toward bankruptcy. The only thing it’s gained during this span is a new title: The robbery capital of the US.

We visited Oakland to answer one simple question: What happened?

“This is the result of progressive policies,” Seneca Scott told us as we drove through an RV encampment near his home. He then took us down one of the many alleys where city residents and out-of-towners dump trash. He told us to roll up our windows because of the smell. 

Oakland RV lot

An underpass used by RVs and as an illegal dump

Street after street after street looked like this: Covered in graffiti and peppered with trash. He mumbled in a funereal tone, “Oakland is a beautiful city. What’s happened is a man-made problem.”

Seneca Scott has become something of a villain in Oakland politics. A self-proclaimed “post-partisan community organizer,” he led the successful recall of Oakland’s mayor Sheng Thao in 2024. But he’s by no means a right-winger. 

He came to Oakland in 2012 to lead a chapter of the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), one of the country’s most powerful unions. Social work is in his blood; his dad is a cousin of Coretta Scott King, MLK Jr.’s widow. Before becoming East Bay Director for the SEIU Local, he attended Cornell University. In the years that followed, he was a proud “progressive Democrat.” But Covid changed him.

Recalling a mayor is extremely rare. There’s been no successful recall of a mayor in a major city since Ballotpedia began keeping track in 2010. The last one we could find took place in Spokane, WA, in 2005 after allegations were made that mayor Jim West sexually abused young men and hired them in City Hall for sexual favors. One internet sleuth got the mayor to seduce him in a chat room on Gay.com. West went down, making him the lone mayor to get recalled this century – until Seneca Scott came for Sheng Thao.

In 2023, one year into Thao’s tenure as mayor, Oakland’s crime was spiraling to levels unseen in a decade. From 2020 to 2023, total crime doubled. Violent crime was even worse, rising to 174% of its 2020 level. 

2023 saw Oakland become the robbery capital of America, recording 639 robberies per 100,000 residents, ahead of second-place Baltimore’s rate of 556 per 100,000. One out of 10 residents was a victim of a property crime. Yet perhaps the most staggering statistic was this: For every 27 Oakland residents, one car was stolen in 2023.

So how did this happen?

The rest of this report is for paid subscribers, who fund our journalism. If you start a two-week free trial today, you’ll be automatically entered to win a free year. Once you sign up, you can access all of our articles here!

Editor’s Note

We want to hear your thoughts on today’s story, particularly Oakland readers: What do you all make of the situation in America’s inner cities? Are there any success stories you know of? Let us know by replying here.

Also, looking for some additional Sunday reading? Find our latest below:

And we received a huge number of replies to yesterday’s double feature, including many about whether we are “normalizing Trump.” We can only feature a fraction of what we received, but a handful of representative replies are below:

Bernardo wrote:

Greetings from a US nationalized Venezuelan immigrant that consistently walks the fine line between the two ever more so extreme political offerings, just like most other nationals, I'm sure. Populism, interventionism, energy and technological advancements in the face of climate change, religion's role in both our governmental systems and conversations with neighbors, so many things that constantly challenge me (or maybe invite me?) to take a stance. It's quite the particular yet ubiquitous feeling.

Reading your articles is one of the two or three things I get to do on a regular basis that helps me with the feeling I attempted to describe above, and for that I thank you sincerely. Your reports not only make me better informed, but they also do it in a way that allows me to connect with people that have different stances to mine, resorting to natural curiosity.

Today's feature was genius, the first article taking us through such a compact and relevant timeline that quickly depicts the political and societal gap that you so well cover on your daily stories, and the second, the second is the reason why I signed up and why I foresee that you have so much runway in the path of accelerated and brilliant growth.

Diane wrote:

Brilliant response to the criticism. I appreciate that you guys are willing to read the critiques and evaluate your own perspectives. By and large I agree with you on this one, normalize the guy and then win the argument. So much of our society is hell bent on having the most convincing argument but truly absorbing opposing opinions until you can build trust will take us so much further. We, the American people, have far more in common with one another than we have that makes us different. Maybe a level-headed millennial can take us somewhere better in the next election series.

And Louis wrote:

I first started following you on Instagram because I believed you were the most credible news source out there. I signed up to receive your newsletters and it only confirmed my belief. Your following has grown because of your commitment to report the news as straight as you see it. Your success is the biggest marker of that. When it comes to Trump, he’s an imperfect person just like the rest of us; but for reasons personalized to each of his non-supporters, no matter what he does that’s objectively good, it will never be enough. The mania splatters onto anyone who recognizes anything Trump does and doesn’t try to make it negative for the sole purpose of wanting to see him lose. Roca News has no agenda, please keep it that way. You never be able to please everyone, but you can always stay true to yourselves and what you represent. Don’t let a few opinions that you can never change… change you.

We’ll be back with more tomorrow.
—Max and Max