- We The 66
- Posts
- 🌊 Project 2025: Trump’s Playbook?
🌊 Project 2025: Trump’s Playbook?
Democrats said Project 2025 would be Trump’s playbook. Has it been?

Did someone forward you this? Subscribe here free!
By Max Frost
Around this time last year, headlines were everywhere about “Project 2025.”
A 920-page book published by the Heritage Foundation, a right-wing think tank in Washington, DC, Democrats labeled it the blueprint for a second Trump Administration. Or as the liberal Center for American Progress noted, “The plan to seize power by gutting America’s system of checks and balances.”
Trump, meanwhile, denied having anything to do with it: “I don’t know anything about it, I don’t want to know anything about it,” he said last July.
“Some on the right, severe right, came up with this Project 25, I don’t even know, some of them I know who they are, but they’re very, very conservative…They’re sort of the opposite of the radical left,” Trump said. “I don’t know what the hell it is…they are extreme, they’re seriously extreme.”
Facing such criticism, Project 2025’s director stepped down.
Four months into the second Trump presidency, though, the dust has started to settle. And with that, we’re able to answer the question: Has Project 2025 been a playbook for the Trump Administration?
That’s the subject of today’s deep-dive.

The Heritage Foundation has created a list of recommendations for each Republican candidate since the 1980s. Project 2025 is only the most recent installment. It was launched in 2022, before it was clear that Trump would be the Republican nominee, and provided both a detailed list of policy and personnel recommendations for the next administration.
Now, let’s jump to chapter II, on how the president should govern. The chapter was written by Russ Vought and begins:
In its opening words, Article II of the U.S. Constitution makes it abundantly clear that “[t]he executive power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America.” That enormous power is not vested in departments or agencies, in staff or administrative bodies, in nongovernmental organizations or other equities and interests close to the government. The President must set and enforce a plan for the executive branch. Sadly, however, a President today assumes office to find a sprawling federal bureaucracy that all too often is carrying out its own policy plans and preferences—or, worse yet, the policy plans and preferences of a radical, supposedly “woke” faction of the country.
Today, Vought, who wrote that, is the head of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) (“the government’s HR branch”), while the White House has used that theory – of the “Unitary Executive” – to justify Trump’s unprecedented number of executive orders. The White House has said those orders are intended to “deconstruct the administrative state” – just as Project 2025 called for. But what about everything else?
The rest of this report is for paid subscribers, who fund our journalism. If you start a two-week free trial today, you’ll be automatically entered to win a free year. Once you sign up, you can access all of our articles here!

Editor’s Note
We have consistently received angry replies from Trump supporters who have accused us of being anti-Trump by mentioning Project 2025. To be clear, we don’t have a stance on it. We find the question of whether he is following it interesting, though.
So what do you all think? Is Trump following it? Is he just doing what any conservative president would do? Is he even a conservative? Let us know by replying to this email.
Speaking of replies, there were loads to yesterday’s story on how companies are abandoning Pride Month. Read it here if you missed it.
Logan wrote:
LGBTQ+ people simply want to live their lives like everyone else, they’re not hurting anyone. Pride exists, and continues to exist, because discrimination against LGBTQ+ people has a long history and still persists today, and that’s putting it lightly.
Corporations, at their core, exist to make money. They adapt to social and political trends to keep shareholders and boards happy. We’ve seen this with the rapid adoption of generative AI and their shifting stances on remote work. When the political climate changes, so do their priorities. They’re rarely “in it for the long haul” on a lot of things.
Over the last few years, leaders in the Republican Party have targeted LGBTQ+ issues to energize their base ahead of elections. It’s a political tactic: create a scapegoat, stir up controversy, and rally supporters. It’s tiring when it’s wrongly used on your own people. Now, with Republicans holding a majority in Congress, corporations are adjusting their messaging and lobbying efforts to maintain access and influence, hoping for favorable policies that will make them more money, although I’m not sure how that’s working out so far this year (see: ongoing tariff chaos).
Meanwhile, real issues like affordability in America continue to be neglected. My own wallet certainly hasn’t benefited. Instead, time and energy are wasted on non-issues, like banning hard-working trans Americans from serving in the military. That’s not just wrong, it’s a distraction from the problems that actually affect Americans’ daily lives.
Steve wrote:
Great reporting once again. Thanks for the history lesson! I consider myself a typical US male. I don't care about a person's sexual preference. I have gay family members, and throughout my life they have never influenced or attempted to influence my sexuality. I believe that this is where the problem lies. If you are gay or trans, or some member of the LBGTQ community just live your life. You don't need my permission nor do I have to accept your lifestyle. Unfortunately many LBGTQ community members seem to be looking for that sensational attention and DEMAND that I (people in general) recognise them and almost revere them. Yes, when I see a man dressed as a woman on the street, I will do a double take, but (to me) it's like any other anomaly, attracting my attention for the difference. I don't see it as good or bad, just an anomaly. I still see people dressed as "goth", multiple face piercings, and or tattoos from the neck up and I do a double take, that is what they are requesting, right? There are many people that choose the LBGTQ lifestyle that I interact with in my daily life. I don't pretend to know what their lifestyle is and that's not my concern, treat me in a respectable manner and I will in turn treat you in a respectable manner. Yes, we have the people out there that are violent towards the LBGTQ community, They are fighting issues with their own sexuallity. Like the bullies in school and in life, they have unresolved issues, and they usually don't bully just the LBGTQ, but anyone they see as "weaker". My biggest concern is LEAVE THE CHILDREN ALONE! Let them grow up. They don't need to be burdened with adult issues until they're considered an adult, I would prefer anyone, especially their parents, not to be able to request transition until they have reached the age of eighteen. Should they experiment with the gay, cross dressing, bisexual prior to that age, that's up to them, but the transformation is a permanent decision.
I guess what I would say is just go about your life, we all are just trying to get through this thing called life, treat people with respect and the majority of them will return the respect. No one gets out alive, yet!
Thanks for the replies. And if you missed them, check out our last five stories here:
See you tomorrow.
–Max and Max