- We The 66
- Posts
- Should Bridge Colby Be Confirmed?
Should Bridge Colby Be Confirmed?
Trump’s most controversial nominee may be a man you’ve never heard of
Did someone forward you this? Subscribe here free!
Once a week over the next month, we are giving away a free year of Roca Premium. To be eligible, you have to be a subscriber or signed up for a free trial. If you already subscribe, you’re automatically entered. If not, enter today by starting a free trial!
By Max Frost
Even President Trump’s most controversial nominees have been approved: Pete Hegseth, who was accused of several sexual assaults; RFK Jr., who was labeled an “anti-vaxxer”; Tulsi Gabbard, who was accused of being a Russian asset; and Kash Patel, who promised to turn the headquarters of his soon-to-be organization, the FBI, into a “museum of the deep state.”
Yet the nominee who faces perhaps the most difficult path wasn’t nominated to lead a department or serve as the head of an agency. In fact, he was nominated to serve in a position that typically receives little attention: The Under Secretary of Defense for Policy.
And that man is Elbridge “Bridge” Colby.
Today’s deep dive examines what Colby believes, why he faces so much opposition, and what his approval or rejection will mean for the United States.

First, a note on foreign policy: Since the end of the Cold War, Republicans and Democrats in Washington, DC have been broadly aligned on America’s role in the world. They generally view US commitments – such as NATO in Europe; close ties with Israel, Saudi Arabia, and others in the Middle East; and support for South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, and the Philippines in Asia – as fundamental to global security. The parties disagreed on specific policies, but they agreed on this general framework.
Colby does not.
The rest of this report is for paid subscribers, who fund our journalism. If you start a two-week free trial today, you’ll be automatically entered to win a free year. Once you sign up, you can access all of our articles here!

Editor’s Note
Very curious to hear your thoughts on Bridge Colby. Is the US overextended? Is he right about disengaging from the Middle East and Europe? Or will that begin (or accelerate) America’s decline? Let us know by replying to this email.
Also, here are our last five stories

Reader Replies
Tons of feedback to yesterday’s look at Zelensky and whether Ukraine can be considered a democracy. We’ve featured a selection below.
Kevin from Lafayette, LA wrote:
Short answer: Yes.
This is why I appreciate Roca so much. I am a supporter of Trump but have serious questions regarding the way he handles things from time to time. He can sometimes act like a pitbull in a meat market. I saw the blow up at the WH with Zelensky and I didn't like the shit show. I believe deep down that Trump is for America first and he is a master negotiator. In the time that has passed looking through different sources I see that while this situation is dire , I believe Trump has and still has a plan all along. The media likes to chide Trump when he says Zelensky is a dictator. And while I have my feelings about Ukraine and what has happened, I can see where this comment would be applicable.
I don't trust mainstream media and you all are one source of "facts". Admittedly, I don't watch the news as much as I should. It is overwhelming because as you all have proven and shown....there is no black and white in life and social construct, just the stories of the innocent, and villains that make this construct up.
Thank you all so much for the reporting and just putting the facts out there.
Steve wrote:
Thanks Gentlemen for insight to the Ukraine debacle. I’m not sure that the politics of Ukraine are a big concern for me. What concerns me is that we have sent billions of dollars to finance a war that is un-winnable. There is over $50,000,000,000 that is unaccounted for by the Ukrainian “government”. That’s their leadership saying such. That’s our money. Taxpayers in this country should be demanding accountability! There should be a peace plan with realistic goals for ending the war. Should the EU decide to fund the continuation of this war it’s on them.
Blake wrote:
I find it ironic that our political leaders label Zelensky a dictator on national television while failing to condemn Putin’s aggression towards Ukraine or say anything negative about him. Perhaps this is because Putin holds most of the "cards" in the negotiations, and we want to maintain a positive dialogue with him. However, it seems absurd to produce a video portraying Ukraine (the defender) as undemocratic while overlooking or failing to condemn Putin’s over 20 years in power as the aggressor.
Gavin wrote:
I think that, at this current time, any input from the US on Zelensky's right to lead should be taken with a massive pinch of salt. There's a clear bias from the US government after everything that has happened in the last week. Had Zelensky outright agreed to all of the initial demands from the US there wouldn't be a word said regarding the legitimacy of Zelensky's leadership as to question it would be to also question his right to sign any mineral deal.
Taking both sides' arguments into view, time will tell whether or not Ukraine is still a democracy. They're facing an unprecedented issue for modern time and as such there is no easy way for us to say that they're taking the right course of action or the wrong one. Pushing for an election at this moment would likely only weaken Ukraine as a whole, both from a resources perspective and as a result of the interference we'd likely see.
Personally, I believe that Ukraine is still a democracy. The government was elected in the first place to represent the people and, from my understanding, they're continuing to govern to the letter of the law. With the questionable legality of the actions that the US government is currently undertaking it feels very "do as I say, but not as I do". I would hope that Ukraine, in time, is able to return to normalcy and that with the end of the war it will welcome back full and unquestioned democracy.
Thank you all for writing in. Again, please send us your thoughts on Bridge Colby: Is his vision for the US one you support? Will it make war more or less likely? Reply to this email to let us know.
-Max and Max