- We The 66
- Posts
- đ The Art of the Grift
đ The Art of the Grift
Two new bombshell books about the Biden Administration expose DC grift at its finest

Did someone forward you this? Subscribe here free!
By Max Towey
The current #1 NYT best-selling book is Original Sin by âjournalistsâ Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson. The existence of the book â and a similar one just announced â is a farce.
Original Sin describes how the media and Democratic Party covered up President Bidenâs cognitive decline. The book argues that Bidenâs decision to run for a second term was a critical and ego-fueled mistake â his âoriginal sin,â which doomed the Dems in 2024.
The irony is not hard to find. With the exception of MSNBCâs Joe Scarborough â whose âthis version of Joe Biden is the best Joe Bidenâ monologue has aged like milk â perhaps nobody in the media is more to blame for the coverup of Bidenâs cognitive decline than Jake Tapper.
With a two-hour daily news show on CNN and 3.5M followers on social media, Tapper had the perfect platform to highlight Bidenâs gaffes, freezes, and incoherent ramblings. He even served as the moderator of Bidenâs now-infamous June 2024 debate with Trump. Why cosplay as a courageous politically independent journalist now when he couldâve been one just months before? Was he worried about helping Trump? Was it the lack of a book deal?
Tapper didnât merely commit sins of omission. Ahead of the 2020 election, around the time his book claims Bidenâs cognitive downfall began, Lara Trump raised questions about Bidenâs mental fitness on Tapperâs show. He confronted her, accusing her of making fun of his stutter: âHow do you think it makes little kids with stutters feel when they see you make a comment like that?â He continued, â[You have] absolutely no standing to diagnose somebodyâs cognitive decline.â
Tapper claims he was more scrutinizing in the 2024 election cycle. He cites his confrontation with White House officials about special counsel Robert Hurâs report that found the president to be mentally unfit. In the wake of the Hur report, after Biden turned down the traditional pre-Super Bowl interview for the second year in a row, Tapper asked in a panel discussion, âIsn't the White House signaling with that decision, like, âWe're afraid of putting him out there?ââ
But it was the equivalent of mumbling âitâs a little warm hereâ in a house on fire. Then again, compared to some of his colleagues at CNN he sounded like the fireman who ran into the burning building and carried out two bodies.
CNN legal expert â and noted Zoom exhibitionist â Jeffrey Toobin scolded Hur for making âunnecessary pointsâ about Bidenâs advanced age and characterized the special counsel as a âRepublican partisan.â CNN pundit Paul Begala chalked up the report to Hur wanting revenge on Biden, who voted against Hurâs old boss, William Rehnquist, during his Supreme Court confirmation in 1986. And these were their legal analysts! The main hosts â including Tapper â stayed relatively silent.
Alex Thompson, Tapperâs co-author of Original Sin and an Axios journalist, at least has some self-awareness. As he confessed at the White House Correspondentsâ Dinner, âWe, myself included, missed a lot of this story. And some people trust us less because of it. We bear some responsibility for faith in the media being at such lows.â
Yet despite their complicity with the mediaâs coverup, the book is crushing: Itâs topped the NYT best sellers list for two consecutive weeks and is currently #2 on Amazonâs best sellers list. Think itâs a shameless money grab? Too little too late? Well, just wait until you hear about this next book!
In a âhold my beerâ display of one-upmanship, Bidenâs former press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre (KJP) just announced her tell-all book.
In Independent: A Look Inside a Broken White House, Outside the Party Lines, KJP explains her decision to leave the Democratic Party and become an independent. KJP â whose job was to trumpet misinformation about Bidenâs cognitive state â now wants to tell you the cold hard truth.
Or, from a skepticâs point of view, itâs another tell-all by a public servant who couldâve told all when it mattered just months before.
KJPâs White House colleagues seem unconvinced of a genuine conversion. One of them quote tweeted her book announcement with a caption of âlol,â while another told the NY Post they â[cackled] in chats all day.â The pivot, that person said, can be explained by one word: âMoney.â The book comes amid reports that KJP also sought a gig as a co-host on The View after leaving the White House, however, no such offer materialized. The book route may be a next best bet.
To our non-partisan eyes, KJPâs book condemning partisanship and political lies may be worse than OJ Simpsonâs If I Did It. After all, we have daysâ worth of footage of KJP perpetuating the shameless partisanship and political lies that she now condemns. KJP didnât just play down concerns about Bidenâs cognitive abilities â she tried to shut them all down. As she replied when asked in 2022 if Biden had the âstaminaâ for a second term, âThat is not a question that we should be even asking.â

This sort of grift is hardly unique to Bidenworld: Bookstores could each have an entire section devoted to Trumpworld tell-alls. But the shamelessness from Tapper and KJP, who are now proving that they were complicit in a cover-up for the ages, is the story of the moment. And as people examine this most toxic form of partisanship, the authorsâ bank accounts are growing by the day.

Editorâs Note
This is why Roca exists. As alternative media monetize conspiracy theories and legacy media monetize partisanship, we seek the truth. Having a politically diverse audience who supports this mission holds us accountable. If you support our mission, please subscribe here. Unlike Jake Tapper, we have no audience or advertiser pressure to deceive. Your support of our mission to provide unbiased news makes that possible.
Now if youâll excuse us, we have to run to Barnes & Noble for Nick Cannonâs book on the importance of monogamy.
As always, please send us your thoughts on todayâs reporting.
And in case you missed our latest stories, find them here:
We got a huge number of replies to yesterdayâs story on SNAP funds and whether junk food should be ineligible. Weâre sharing a few of those emails below.
Amanda wrote:
Yes, they should 100% ban all junk food. I am a SNAP recipient but still need to buy groceries on top of the amount we receive from SNAP. I don't buy soda because water is free. It's not like soda is a need. I have a family member who buys candy bars at the check out counter. Do you know how much those cost? They aren't cheap. Not only is it unhealthy but recipients aren't taught to budget well. Being able to buy anything encourages bad health and poor decision making.
JD wrote:
My understanding is that a lot of underserved communities with lots of residents on food stamps don't have access to nutritious foods - with or without food stamps. It's hard to buy healthy food if there's only one food store in your area, and they don't sell it. And if you're already impoverished and working multiple jobs, you probably don't have time to cook from scratch either. To me, this seems more like villainizing the poor than making any kind of change that will actually help (like ensuring access to healthy and nutritious food).
Danielle from Central PA wrote:
As a SNAP recipient a.k.a. single mom with two kids and a full time job and a mortgage, I'm really ok with this! I work my butt off to keep us going, but I still need help from the state to pay for everything. It frustrates me seeing people buying so much junk food and soda at the stores, yes, it's delicious, but it's not helping anybody. The soda companies can whine all they want, but I'm sorry (not sorry) someone's trying to stop you from fattening us up. Clearly, enough people are not being responsible enough to spend their SNAP money on the proper foods to stay healthy. This is geared towards those knuckleheads. The rest of us, who actually buy food properly won't really be affected.
And Myah wrote:
Restricting foods to people on SNAP is a slippery slope. It sensors peopleâs ability and autonomy of what food and drinks people can consume. If you are in a position to receive SNAP benefits you are not able to have food you enjoy which can be a relief and safe space.
There are a couple main issues with obesity in our country. Its ignorance of nutrition-food labeling is very misleading. The FDA labels granola bars prepackaged oat meal, wheat bread, cereal as healthy where you could just eat the sugar version and a candy bar with just as much sugar in it. As
People shouldnât be diagnosed with diabetes to understand that their chicken and rice frozen dinner is full of chemicals and actually slowly killing them.
The FDA is the one thatâs bad. Not the people who are in food deserts and donât have any food education.
Thanks for reading. Weâll be back tomorrow. See you then.
âMax and Max