- We The 66
- Posts
- 🌊 The Palantir List
🌊 The Palantir List
Is the Palantir list a step toward efficiency or a frightening new world?

Did someone forward you this? Subscribe here free!
By Max Frost
Right now, each government database keeps its data on Americans separately. The IRS has its information on you, Social Security has its information, and the CDC may have its information. The White House wants to combine this information, create a master list, and hire Palantir to do it.
The plan is causing widespread alarm. Should it?

We wrote about Palantir back in April. For those who are unfamiliar, though, it was founded by the right-wing Silicon Valley entrepreneur/philosopher Peter Thiel with investment from the CIA to analyze big datasets for counter-terrorism purposes.
But as we wrote then:
Palantir didn’t stop at the intelligence community. Soon, the company was winning contracts with police departments, immigration authorities, and even financial regulators. It was deployed to track welfare fraud, monitor border crossings, and process Medicare data. During the Covid pandemic, Palantir provided software to manage hospital resources and vaccine distribution.
Palantir’s most powerful platform, Gotham, became the go-to system for government analysts who needed to sift through oceans of data and find connections that might otherwise be invisible. Imagine an intelligence officer trying to track a suspected terrorist: Gotham let them pull in financial records, travel histories, social media activity, and law enforcement databases in seconds. Its commercial counterpart, Foundry, is used by corporations and government agencies alike to manage massive datasets for everything from supply chain logistics to medical research.
Palantir – now a $313B company – has received more than $113M in federal money since Trump took office. Last month, it won a $795M contract with the Department of Defense. Unsurprisingly, business is booming: Palantir stock is up 77% since Trump took office.
The government sees Palantir as solving major problems. Critics – from those who worry about surveillance to opponents of ICE and Israel – say it’s creating a modern-day Big Brother.
Those critics received a shot in the arm late last month, when news emerged of Palantir’s new project: Helping compile a set of government data on all Americans.
The rest of this report is for paid subscribers, who fund our journalism. If you start a two-week free trial today, you’ll be automatically entered to win a free year. Once you sign up, you can access all of our articles here!

Editor’s Note
What do you all think? Are you concerned about the database? Or is it a smart step forward in government efficiency? Let us know by replying to this email.
And if you’re looking for further reading, find our latest stories below:
Some interesting responses to yesterday’s article on Joe Rogan:
Harry from Canada wrote:
He's been doing podcasts for over 10 yrs (before they were cool), and has always had various guests on his show - some he doesn't agree with and others he does, and others he's indifferent.
The interview isn't different from what he's always done, this isn't new.
It is a shame that ppl from any side criticize someone who has honestly tried to show both sides and question everything - which I believe is what democracy is all about.
Having good discussions and sharing various points of view allow ppl to critically think for themselves.
If anything this new type of long form media is hard to "fake".
After 1 to 2 to 3 hrs of talking you cover a lot of issues in real time.
Zach wrote:
Kamala did not reject an invitation to be on Rogan's show, her team tried to control it by setting all these rules and stipulations about where the show has to be, time constraints, certain subjects that were off topic...all things that wouldn't have made the show JRE, it would have been yet another watered down interview. But Rogan isn't controlled like mainstream journalists because that's not who he is, nor the types of interviews he does, so he declined their contingencies and both sides decided not to move forward with an interview, which imo probably lost her the election (one of many factors, but a big one). This is discussed in multiple episodes of the JRE, and unfortunately saying Kamala declined an invitation to the show leaves out some important details.
Editor’s reply: Yes, and given those stipulations and her refusal to follow Rogan’s rules, we thought it was fair to say she rejected his invitation to come on.
And Jared wrote:
I think Rogan having Patel on is certainly odd and seemingly unprecedented; I’m not aware of a sitting FBI Director that’s been on a podcast. That being said, something doesn’t quite add up to me about the episode. I’m not a conspiracy guy at all, but for some reason I think there was an ulterior motive at play.
In a recent episode (might’ve been Segura, but not super important) Rogan himself had said that he believes people are “sent to him” in order to obfuscate facts/scenarios or provide misinformation. This one seems to fit the bill pretty obviously. You have two guys in Patel and Bongino that were banging the drums on the Epstein conspiracy for YEARS before being appointed to their positions. Now, all the sudden, it’s “nothing to see here” and “I’ve seen the evidence- he definitely killed himself.” I’m not buying it.
From Rogan’s perspective, if the sitting FBI Director requests to come on your podcast, you accept. So I don’t blame him for having him on at all. If you watch the full episode, Joe pushes back pretty significantly about the Epstein case. The one thing people criticize him for frequently is “not pushing back enough” but what makes him so good at what he does is that he pretty clearly recognizes when someone is either hiding something or isn’t being truthful and just moves on. He’s not in the business of the Piers Morgan-type screaming heads on a screen.
I think this was an effort to suppress the heat this administration was getting regarding Epstein. As previously stated, you have two guys at the top of the FBI who were all in on the conspiracy angle prior to getting in. Now, they’ve done a complete 180 and they know their supporters are angry and now don’t trust them. What better way to fix the narrative than go on the biggest podcast in the world and tell everyone “trust me, I was the guy that wanted to get the info out, and now that I’ve seen it- he killed himself.” And then just hope everyone goes about their day. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that on 5/18 Patel first releases his official statement, and 2 weeks later he’s on Rogan to try and control the narrative.
Editor’s reply: We’re working on a story about this (the Kash/Bongino pivot) right now. Quite a shift that has been largely ignored by the media.
Thanks for reading! See you tomorrow.
–Max and Max