• We The 66
  • Posts
  • 🌊 Will Trump Abolish the Education Department?

🌊 Will Trump Abolish the Education Department?

And if he does, what will change?

Did someone forward you this? Subscribe here free!

Once a week over the next month, we are giving away a free year of Roca Premium. To be eligible, you have to be a subscriber or signed up for a free trial. If you already subscribe, you’re automatically entered. If not, enter today by starting a free trial!

By Max Frost

On Wednesday, the Trump Administration announced it would cut the Department of Education (ED) workforce in half. 

The roughly 2,000 departures prompted a split reaction: Many on the left saw a long-held fear materializing. Many on the right saw a step toward a long-held goal: Abolishing the Department of Education.

The ED is the US’ third-newest executive branch department, established under President Jimmy Carter in 1980. At the time, the federal government’s education efforts were part of the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Carter said education deserved to be more than a secondary focus of a department – it deserved its own. 

Carter also owed America’s teachers: Their main union, the National Education Association, was among a major proponent of establishing the department. They, along with civil rights activists, considered it a way to ensure better education funding and standards. They supported Carter and he paid them back with the department. 

In 1979, the Senate voted 69-22 and the House voted 215-201 to create it. 

Majorities of Republicans in both chambers opposed the department’s creation. Conservatives called it a quintessential example of federal overreach, noting that the Constitution didn’t specifically grant the federal government power over education. They said its establishment was unjust – and never gave up hope of eliminating it. 

45 years later, they may be getting their way: Last week, a leaked memo revealed that Trump plans to order the department’s elimination. Yesterday, he cut its workforce by 50%. 

In today’s deep-dive, we ask: Has the Department of Education been a success? What are the arguments for and against getting rid of it? Will Trump actually be able to do so?

The rest of this report is for paid subscribers, who fund our journalism. If you start a two-week free trial today, you’ll be automatically entered to win a free year. Once you sign up, you can access all of our articles here!

Editor’s Note

So there are the arguments. Is eliminating the ED a good idea? Do you buy the arguments for? What about against? Let us know by replying to this email.

And here are the last five stories: 

Unsurprisingly received a ton of feedback about the Khalil article. The responses were extremely diverse – here are a selection.

Zach wrote:

First of all, I have to say that I loved the Instagram reel you all shared yesterday essentially arguing both sides of the issue. It was a really straightforward presentation of both sides.

I've definitely been extremely hesitant to "pick a side" on this issue because mainstream media has either presented this as, "Non-American citizen terrorist is being reported as he should be" and "100% naturalized American citizen is being reported for peaceful protest," and I figured the situation had to be more nuanced than that. I was eagerly anticipating the Roca wrap to give me the non-biased facts of the story, and you all did not disappoint.

As it stands, I still don't think we can definitively say he absolutely should or should not be deported. I think there's enough evidence to bring the case to an immigration court, but not enough evidence that I'm sure he should be convicted, so I think letting it play out through the system would be the best course of action. I do think it all hinges on has he ever promoted violence; if so, then he has forfeited his green card in my opinion. If not, he's allowed to bash America and Israel all he wants; that's the freedom of being an American.

Mary wrote:

I just read your article on Mahmoud Khalil. I must say I enjoyed reading it. There were no opinions given , just straight facts. It is almost impossible to find that in today's news. As for Mahmoud, If he did what they say he did, he should be removed from the campus but should be given a second chance. At this point I believe removing him from the country is a little harsh.

Courtney wrote:

In most other countries, Khalil’s actions would have resulted in jail time or deportation long before now. Individuals in the U.S. on student visas or who are allowed to stay and work through the green card program are not citizens and therefore do not share the same rights as citizens. I find it puzzling that some people believe anyone who enters the United States is automatically entitled to the same rights and freedoms as a citizen. That is not the case. Such individuals are guests in the country, and if their behavior is deemed unacceptable, authorities have the right to remove them.

Judith wrote:

As much as I dislike the manner to which this all went down and I am far from a Trump supporter, Mahmoud should be deported.

I feel broken for the Palestine people.  War is beyond tragic. But Mahmoud’s anti America rhetoric and support of Hamas a know terrorist organization, is grounds for revoking his green card. 

Free speech is one thing, but like the MAGA’s hateful bigotry, we have to draw the line somewhere.  Now that social media isn’t moderated, dangerous rhetoric will be (is) out of control.

And Amene wrote:

Usually I find most of your articles pretty free from bias until today. You failed to mention several key facts in presenting Mahmoud’s case. First of all he has never been charged, forget being convicted of any crime. His expulsion from the university was overturned because they found no crime was committed.

I’m sure there were many agitators within the crowd that spread hate and anti semitism but the majority were students who stood up against our government’s funding, arming and support of Israel’s campaign of genocide. It’s documented by multiple humanitarian organizations and the UN that Israel with our support targeted civilians in their war. Thousands have died or been permanently maimed. Starvation was and is still being used as a weapon of war. Close to two million people have been displaced and over 70% of the infrastructure has been damaged or destroyed. This can’t be ignored when explaining why the students in US universities took action. Saying many Jewish students felt uncomfortable it’s also worthy to say Islamophobia has risen on college campuses ten fold. They were many incidents on campuses were student protesters were also harassed, example would be at the University of Mississippi when frat boys surrounded protesters and make monkey noises intimidating woman of color. The idea that protesting the United States government’s foreign policy is somehow a crime and not our guaranteed constitutional right to free speech is despicable. It feels like McCarthism is back,   where anyone who disagrees with you or doesn’t believe the status quo is a supporter of terrorism… in the old days we called them all communist.

Thank you for these replies and look forward to seeing the next batch. Send them here and see you tomorrow.

–Max and Max